4 posts categorized "ACOs"

April 23, 2012

27 ACOs began work April 1

CMS's 27 Shared Savings Program ACOs, which began on April 1, will serve an estimated 375,000 beneficiaries in 18 states. The group has collectively more than 10,000 physicians, 10 hospitals and 13 physician-driven organizations.

21 of the 27 ACOs are physician-run. The American Medical Association also noted that five of the approved groups will participate under an advance payment model, which provides up-front funding from Medicare to cover the costs of establishing the infrastructure needed to coordinate patient care. Only two of the 27 approved ACOs agreed to be held accountable for a share of any losses if Medicare costs for the patients receiving coordinated care exceed projections. The rest of the groups will not be exposed to possible penalties, but they will be eligible for a lower share of potential savings compared with the two ACOs exposed to risk.

Under the current model, which is different from the true capitation model, it will be interesting to see if savings can really be achieved. I'm personally skeptical. We'll just have to wait and see on this one.

For details about the 27 ACOs, check out this link

http://www.vcpi.com/Portals/96686/docs/ACO%20-%20selected%20for%20start%20up%204-1-12.pdf

January 16, 2012

ACO whitepaper released

Following the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s emphasis on Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) and the announcement of the Medicare Shared Savings Program, an increased interest has emerged among providers and payers to create ACOs. To date, little has been published regarding the types and locations of organizations adopting principles of accountable care.

As a result, Leavitt Partners has created a white paper entitled "Growth and Dispersion of Accountable Care Organizations."

http://leavittpartnersblog.com/2011/11/growth-and-dispersion-of-accountable-care-organizations/

In the white paper, the sponsoring ACO entities included hospital systems, physician groups and insurers with a market presence in 41 states but less than half of all HRRs. Of these entities, 99 were primarily sponsored by hospital systems, 38 by physician groups and 27 by insurers.

December 27, 2011

Selected Participants in the Pioneer ACO Model

The Pioneer Accountable Care Organization (ACO) Model is a CMS Innovation Center initiative designed to support organizations with a new payment model, allowing them to provide more coordinated care to beneficiaries at a lower cost to Medicare. The Pioneer ACO Model will test the impact of several innovative payment arrangements to support these organizations in achieving the goals of better care and outcomes at a lower cost.

The Pioneer ACO Model was designed specifically for organizations with experience offering coordinated, patient-centered care, and operating in ACO-like arrangements. The selected organizations were chosen for their significant experience offering this type of quality care to their patients, along with other criteria listed in the Request for Applications (RFA) document available at www.innovations.cms.gov. These organizations were selected through an open and competitive process from a large applicant pool that included many qualified organizations.

The descriptions of selected ACOs provided in this document are based on information provided by the ACOs for publication and do not necessarily reflect the views of CMS. Organizations participating in the Pioneer ACO Model:

Organization and Service Area

1. Allina Hospitals & Clinics Minnesota and Western Wisconsin
2. Atrius Health Services Eastern and Central Massachusetts
3. Banner Health Network Phoenix, Arizona Metropolitan Area (Maricopa and Pinal Counties)
4. Bellin-Thedacare Healthcare Partners Northeast Wisconsin
5. Beth Israel Deaconess Physician Organization Eastern Massachusetts
6. Bronx Accountable Healthcare Network (BAHN) New York City (the Bronx) and lower Westchester County, NY
7. Brown & Toland Physicians San Francisco Bay Area, CA
8. Dartmouth-Hitchcock ACO New Hampshire and Eastern Vermont
9. Eastern Maine Healthcare System Central, Eastern, and Northern Maine
10. Fairview Health Systems Minneapolis, MN Metropolitan Area
11. Franciscan Health System Indianapolis and Central Indiana
12. Genesys PHO Southeastern Michigan
13. Healthcare Partners Medical Group Los Angeles and Orange Counties, CA
14. Healthcare Partners of Nevada Clark and Nye Counties, NV
15. Heritage California ACO Southern, Central, and Costal California
16. JSA Medical Group, a division of HealthCare Partners Orlando, Tampa Bay, and surrounding South Florida
17. Michigan Pioneer ACO Southeastern Michigan
18. Monarch Healthcare Orange County, CA
19. Mount Auburn Cambridge Independent Practice Association (MACIPA) Eastern Massachusetts
20. North Texas Specialty Physicians Tarrant, Johnson and Parker counties in North Texas
21. OSF Healthcare System Central Illinois
22. Park Nicollet Health Services Minneapolis, MN Metropolitan Area
23. Partners Healthcare Eastern Massachusetts
24. Physician Health Partners Denver, CO Metropolitan Area
25. Presbyterian Healthcare Services – Central New Mexico Pioneer Accountable Care Organization Central New Mexico
26. Primecare Medical Network Southern California (San Bernadino and Riverside Counties)
27. Renaissance Medical Management Company Southeastern Pennsylvania
28. Seton Health Alliance Central Texas (11 county area including Austin)
29. Sharp Healthcare System San Diego County
30. Steward Health Care System Eastern Massachusetts
31. TriHealth, Inc. Northwest Central Iowa
32. University of Michigan Southeastern Michigan

November 28, 2011

Final ACO rule and how it might affect physician practices

Physicians are not required to be meaningful users of electronic medical records (“EMR”) as a condition of participating in an ACO, although EMR is now a quality measure and is weighted higher than others. Essentially, CMS elected not to add an extra requirement to ACO participation, preferring instead to permit participating physicians to discover and decide for themselves how best to manage patient data and other information in order to provide coordinated care for their patients.

Allows prospective assignment of patients to ACO’s on a quarterly basis, rather than using a retrospective method for selecting patients to participate in an ACO, as had been originally proposed. In the Final Rule, prospective assignment of patients is permitted in order that physicians shall know in advance which patients are in an ACO, thereby enabling physicians and patients to partner together in order to better address health problems, both in terms of objectives and how to achieve them. In this regard, it should be noted that, according to the Final Rule, only persons enrolled in the Medicare fee-for-service program may be assigned to an ACO.

Eliminates participant risk in the first of the two (2) ACO shared-savings’ models. The Proposed Rule had required that, after the first two (2) years, an ACO choosing the one-sided model (i.e., shared savings among participants without any sharing of losses) would transition into the two-sided model (i.e., shared savings and losses) during the third year. However, the Final Rule provides for shared savings among the participants in the one-sided model during the entire initial agreement period with no sharing of losses in the third year. The two-sided model, where participants share savings and losses for the entire initial agreement period (the first “year” of the initial agreement for ACO’s starting in 2012 will be to 18 to 21 months) continues to include risk- or loss-sharing for participants, but also offers them larger potential rewards than they would have received under the Proposed Rule.

Reduces from 65 to 33 the number of quality measures ACO-participating physicians must report. The Proposed Rule required providers to report on 65 quality measures in five (5) categories so as to enable CMS to assess the quality of care furnished by ACO’s. In response to the comments it received – the majority of which favored utilizing fewer quality measures in order to reduce reporting burdens and attain more focused and meaningful improvements to the Medicare program – CMS reduced to 33 in four (4) categories the required number of quality measures subject to reporting. These categories are as follows: (i) patient/caregiver experience; (ii) care coordination/patient safety; (iii) preventive health; and (iv) at-risk population that includes subcategories of reporting requirements regarding the following disease states: diabetes, hypertension, ischemic vascular disease, and coronary artery disease.

Ensures that all ACO’s shall receive a share of any first-dollar savings generated to Medicare once a minimum amount of savings is achieved, known as the Minimum Savings Rate (“MSR”). The MSR is on a sliding scale, ranging from 3.9% for ACO’s with 5,000-5,999 beneficiaries to 2% for ACO’s with 60,000 or more beneficiaries.