A large part of success/failure is that someone of authority in the practice has to take accountability to direct all the physicians that EMR is either go/no go for the entire group. This is not to say that leading physicians through the buy in process is not vitally important, only that the organization cannot be divided once an implementation decision has been reached. The single most important factor leading to dissatisfaction is allowing physicians to dictate when they will or will not join their peers in adopting EMR within the same practice. A physician champion is needed to make it happen but everyone has to hold hands and jump into the cold water at the same time.
When done right, meaning a complete reengineering of internal processes concurrent with the installation, not just forcing the EMR to mimic "the way we've always done things in the past "goes a long way to realizing acceptable advantages. The monetary challenges and ramp up time will, however, still remain difficult for most.
Thanks for the information. Electronic Health Sytem have the potential to improve patient's Health care and maintain reports of patient.EMR System provides the best way to handle the Patient Secure.
Posted by: Allscripts | December 11, 2009 at 06:54 AM
You're right. Physicians and others under it should use it and it will show the unity. If not, implementation will not work properly.
-nj
Posted by: internal medicine emr | March 07, 2010 at 09:52 PM
I was just out viewing blogs and came across yours.EMR I think will definitely lead to better care.It could improve the quality and accuracy of medical-record documentation and improve quality of care.
Posted by: family practice emr | March 23, 2010 at 05:03 AM
Nice post. Many thanks for sharing this resource…I completely agree the electronic medical record systems assure a significant melioration in health care industry.
Posted by: Medical Pratice Management Software | July 09, 2010 at 06:28 AM